Alex Jones Does Not Understand Brzezinski - Click on the Pics to Hear Audio Clips.

Alex Jones incorrectly characterizes Brzezinksi as admitting tha the is afraid of the global awakening to the New World Order.  Brzezinski' is afraid of people like Alex Jones who offers a vague, emotional, semi-theological definition to today's problems.  Jones does not understand this because before he can understand the accusation he would come face to face with its truth.

What Brzeznksio said was,“I’m very troubled that a very vague, emotionally stated, semi-theologically defined diagnosis of the central global menace is obscuring our national ability to comprehend the historically unprecedented challenge that is being posed in our time by a massive global political awakening, and thus is obstructing our ability to deal effectively with the global political turmoil that this awakening is generating.”

 -Audio Clip of Brzezinksi located at 1:17 of "Architects of Control" by the Chicago We Are Change group.  The We Are Change groups are Alex Jones spin-offs.

In a video clip we see Brzezinski arguing for a global power to cope with the problems of noncohesive world leaders who must deal with the work awakening which he celebrates but cautions against lest the awakening should not be properly recognized and addressed.

"Let me begin by making just a thumbnail definition of the geopolitical context in which we all find ourselvs, including America.  And in my perspective that geopolitical context is very much defined by new, by two, new global realities.

"The first is that global political leadership, by which I mean the role of certain leading powers in the world has now become much more diversified unlike what it was until relatively recently.  Relatively recently the world was still dominated by the Atlantic world as it had been for many centuries.  It no longer is.  

 

"Today the rise of the far east has created a new, but far more differentiated, global leadership.   One which, in a nutshell, involves, if one can hazard an arbitrary list of the  primary players in the world scene, the United States, clearly, maybe next to it but maybe, the European Union -- I say "maybe" because it is not yet a political entity.  Certainly, increasingly so and visibly so, China.  Russia, mainly in one respect only because it is a nuclear power co-equal to the United States but otherwise very deficient in all of the major indices of what constitutes global power.  Behind Russia perhaps individually but to a much lesser extent Germany, France, Great Britain, Japan, certainly, although it does not have a politically assertive posture.  India is rising.  And then in the background of that we have the new entity of G20, a much more diversified global leadership, lacking internal unity with many of its members in bilateral antagonisms.  That makes the context much more complicated.

"The other major change in international affairs is that for the first time in all of human history, mankind is politically awakened.  That's a total new reality: total new reality.  It has not been so for most of human history until the last one hundred years.  And in the course of the last one hundred years the whole world has become politically awakened.  And no matter where you go politics is a matter of social engagement and most people know what is generally going on, generally going on in the world and are consciously aware of global iniquities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation. 

"Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring.  The combination of the two: the diversified global leadership and the politically awakened masses makes a much more difficult context for any major power including currently the leading world power, the United States."

 

Alex Jones and his ilk incorrectly interpret this to mean that Brzezinski fears global political awakening.  What he fears if the fact that there is no unified global leadership.  He is, as Alex Jones says, calling for a world government which Jones resists on religious grounds.